Hi, On Tuesday 03 July 2018 12:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [180611 07:06]: >> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> [180611 06:48]: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Monday 11 June 2018 11:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> [180611 06:28]: >>>>> Great. I thought I completely misunderstood you. But I don't see what >>>>> adding another function will accomplish. A QUIRK flag used in the same >>>>> function would work well enough> >>>> Fine with me as long as the function stays simple for both >>>> syss and sysc reset. >>>> >>> >>> >>> In general a reset status bit being in sysstatus is the norm and it >>> being in sysconfig should be the "quirk" for which a flag needs to be >>> added. What do you think? >> >> Sure makes sense to me. >> >>> As an aside, naming bitshifts by the name of the platform they were >>> originally added in seems weird. There should be some generic mask >>> saying "soft reset is the 0th bit". Currently I am using >>> SYSC_OMAP4_SOFTRESET for a dra76x module. I guess it depends on how many >>> different sysconfig types we have. >> >> Sure we could have a macro for that. > > So what's the conclusion on this one? Are you going to do one > more version of the ti-sysc driver patch? > Yes. I have just now been able to get back to this. Will post a v4 by tomorrow. Thanks, Faiz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
