On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > > > On 6/27/2018 11:42 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:38:48AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > >> > >> > >>On 6/27/2018 11:33 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>>On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > >>>>Hi Guenter/Rob, > >>>> > >>>>Kindly let me know how you want to proceed with this? > >>>> > >>> > >>>If I recall correctly, the patch series does not add a new problem > >>>but merely exposes one. Is my recollection correct ? If so, maybe > >>>we should just add a note somewhere indicating what might be wrong > >>>and otherwise apply the series. > >>> > >>>Does this make sense ? > >> > >>Yes this makes a lot of sense to me. This patch series exposes potential > >>problems in some SoCs that they might not be feeding the correct clock into > >>WDT, at least based on clock names from their DT entries. > >> > >>This patch series does not change/affect how SP805 works on those systems. > >> > >>Where should the note be added? > >> > > > >I would suggest to add a note into the driver where the clock is used, > >with the details discussed here. > > I assume you meant adding the notes to the SP805 driver where the clock is > used. > > If so, I think that makes sense. That notes deserves its own patch because > it really has nothing to do with any of the change in this patch series. > > Do you want me to 1) embed that patch into this patch series and send out > v5; or 2) leave the patch series as it is and send out a separate patch to > add the notes to the driver? > 2) is fine. I don't have the series here right now; if I recall correctly all patches in the series are all marked as Reviewed-by: and/or Acked-by:. If so, I'll apply them to my tree tonight, or at least the ones that will go in through the watchdog tree. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
