On 6/27/2018 11:42 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:38:48AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
On 6/27/2018 11:33 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
Hi Guenter/Rob,
Kindly let me know how you want to proceed with this?
If I recall correctly, the patch series does not add a new problem
but merely exposes one. Is my recollection correct ? If so, maybe
we should just add a note somewhere indicating what might be wrong
and otherwise apply the series.
Does this make sense ?
Yes this makes a lot of sense to me. This patch series exposes potential
problems in some SoCs that they might not be feeding the correct clock into
WDT, at least based on clock names from their DT entries.
This patch series does not change/affect how SP805 works on those systems.
Where should the note be added?
I would suggest to add a note into the driver where the clock is used,
with the details discussed here.
I assume you meant adding the notes to the SP805 driver where the clock
is used.
If so, I think that makes sense. That notes deserves its own patch
because it really has nothing to do with any of the change in this patch
series.
Do you want me to 1) embed that patch into this patch series and send
out v5; or 2) leave the patch series as it is and send out a separate
patch to add the notes to the driver?
Thanks.
Does this make sense ?
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
