Hi Miquel,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Until recently, only one register was referenced in MVEBU thermal IP
> node. Recent changes added a second entry pointing to another
> register right next to it. We cannot know for sure that we will not
> have to access other registers. That will be actually the case when
> overheat interrupt feature will come, where it will be needed to access
> DFX registers in the same area.
>
> This approach is not scalable so intead of adding consinuously memory
> areas in the DT (and change de DT bindings, while keeping backward
s/de/the/
> compatibility), move the thermal node into a wider syscon from which it
> will be possible to also configure the thermal interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
