Hi Viresh, Am Dienstag, den 19.06.2018, 14:35 +0530 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > On 08-06-18, 11:06, Bastian Stender wrote: > > The cooling device should be part of the i.MX cpufreq driver, but it > > cannot be removed for the sake of DT stability. > > I am not sure what you meant by DT stability here. Can you please explain that ? The goal that we strive for in i.MX land is that a any newer kernel boots on a older DT without functional regressions compared to a matching DT/kernel pair when possible. > What about calling both OF and non-OF calls from the cpufreq driver, based on > the fact that data is present in DT or not ? That's right, we could move the cooling device registration completely to the cpufreq driver. As that would consolidate the code some more, I agree that this is the right way to go. Regards, Lucas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
