On 18-06-04 02:33 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 06/04/2018 02:30 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Florian,
On 18-06-04 02:24 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 01:17 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Add otp device node for Stingray SOC.
Fixes: 2fa9e9e29ea2 ("arm64: dts: Add GPIO DT nodes for Stingray SOC")
Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied to devicetree-arm64/next with s/otp/OTP/ and removing the Fixes
line since that is not a bug fix AFAICT.
It fixes the issue that OTP is not active as it is missing the device node?
By that token, any peripheral that is being added at some point in the
lifetime of this DTS would qualify as a bugfix when it is in fact
feature/peripheral enabling.
I could not see the relationship between the commit being provided in
the "Fixes:" tag and OTP, am I missing something?
The relationship is the fixes tag points was selected to the last tag
when the commit applies directly against (and is far enough back that it
covers any possible LTS kernels that would have needed it). In this case
I don't care too much about whether this is fixed in LTS or not. If
needed I'll send a request for the commit be ported to stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
