Quoting Stefan Wahren (2018-05-22 05:25:35) > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx6ul-clock.h > > @@ -242,20 +242,25 @@ > > #define IMX6UL_CLK_CKO2_PODF 229 > > #define IMX6UL_CLK_CKO2 230 > > #define IMX6UL_CLK_CKO 231 > > +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO1 232 > > +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO2 233 > > +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO3 234 > > +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO4 235 > > +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO5 236 > > this change looks like a breakage of devicetree ABI. You are changing the mean of the existing clock IDs on i.MX6ULL, which probably regress the combination of older DTBs with newer kernel. > Agreed. Why can't we just tack on more numbers at the end? > > > > /* For i.MX6ULL */ > > -#define IMX6ULL_CLK_ESAI_PRED 232 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html