Hi Gilad,
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:19 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 03:19:10PM +0100, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>>> Add bindings for CryptoCell instance in the SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> In so far as I can review the details of this (which is not much) this
>> looks fine to me. I am, however, a little unclear in when it should be
>> accepted.
>
> Since Herbert Xu ACKed the driver changes, I would say the only gating
> commit is Geert's CR clock patch.
These are queued for v4.19.
> If that one is in, than I would say this one should go in as well.
As the device node now has a power-domains property, the genpd code will
try to attach it to the CPG/MSSR PM Domain, which is a clock domain.
In the absence of the clock patch, the device's module clock cannot be
found, and dev_pm_domain_attach() and thus platform_drv_probe() will fail,
before calling the device driver's .probe() function.
So there is no longer a dependency on the clock patch, and the DT patch can
go in in parallel (although I prefer its subject to be changed
s/binding/device device/).
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
