Hello Rob,
Could you please suggest if the below looks okay to be implemented?
On 5/24/2018 11:13 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 24-05-18, 10:48, Taniya Das wrote:
Hello Rob, Viresh,
Thank you for the comments. If I understand correctly, the device tree nodes
should look something like the below.
Though I am not sure if any vendor name could be associated in the cpu
nodes.
Well Rob said Yes to that I think.
Please suggest if my understanding is wrong.
cpu@0 {
qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table0>;
…
};
same follows for cpu 1/2/3
cpu@400 {
qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table1>;
…
};
same follows for cpu 5/6/7
freq_domain_table0 : freq_table {
reg = < >, < >, < > ;
reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
};
freq_domain_table1 : freq_table {
reg = < >, < >, < > ;
reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
};
Mostly yes.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
