On 24-05-18, 10:48, Taniya Das wrote:
> Hello Rob, Viresh,
>
> Thank you for the comments. If I understand correctly, the device tree nodes
> should look something like the below.
>
> Though I am not sure if any vendor name could be associated in the cpu
> nodes.
Well Rob said Yes to that I think.
> Please suggest if my understanding is wrong.
>
> cpu@0 {
> qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table0>;
> …
> };
>
> same follows for cpu 1/2/3
>
> cpu@400 {
> qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table1>;
> …
> };
> same follows for cpu 5/6/7
>
> freq_domain_table0 : freq_table {
> reg = < >, < >, < > ;
> reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
> };
>
> freq_domain_table1 : freq_table {
> reg = < >, < >, < > ;
> reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
> };
Mostly yes.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
