Hi Mark, On 18-05-25 11:26, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:47:24AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > > > I found the: "ti,charge-period (sound/ti,tas5086.txt)" binding which > > represents nearly the same but it is not common. One opportunity would be to > > introduce a common "charge-period-us" binding and change the ti binding the > > common binding later. > > Are you sure what you have is a charge period and not some stabalization > time or something? According to the data sheet: 8<----- As described in the Digital Core Clock section of the Theory of Operation, insert enough delay time to charge the VMID decoupling capacitor before setting the active bit [Register R9, Bit D0]. 8<----- I think yes, it is a charge period. Also the formula for the delay time (t = C × 25,000/3.5) depends only on the capacity size. Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
