On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:47:24AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > I found the: "ti,charge-period (sound/ti,tas5086.txt)" binding which > represents nearly the same but it is not common. One opportunity would be to > introduce a common "charge-period-us" binding and change the ti binding the > common binding later. Are you sure what you have is a charge period and not some stabalization time or something?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
