Hi Dmitry,
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 07:03 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
index 5bf63f76ddda..955f085627fa 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
@@ -1007,7 +1007,8 @@ static int edt_ft5x06_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
goto err_remove_attrs;
edt_ft5x06_ts_prepare_debugfs(tsdata, dev_driver_string(&client->dev));
- device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, 1);
+ device_init_wakeup(&client->dev,
+ device_property_read_bool(dev, "wakeup-source"));
I think we should actually drop device_init_wakeup() call. I2C core
already handles "wakeup-source" property (for OF). The static board
files can instantiate clients with I2C_CLIENT_WAKE, so that's handled
too, and I think ACPI has its own notion of annotating wakeup sources.
Ah, right! Thanks, will respin :)
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
