On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:37:04AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Amarula A64 Relic is Allwinner A64 based IoT device, which support > >> - Allwinner A64 Cortex-A53 > >> - Mali-400MP2 GPU > >> - AXP803 PMIC > >> - 1GB DDR3 RAM > >> - 8GB eMMC > >> - AP6330 Wifi/BLE > >> - MIPI-DSI > >> - CSI: OV5640 sensor > >> - USB OTG > >> - 12V DC power supply > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Changes for v2: > >> - Rename dts name to sun50i-a64-relic.dts which is simple to use > > > > This is subjective. For other users this hardly qualifies to > > identify the board. Please keep the vendor / brand name in > > the file name. > > Which I thought initially, but adding vendor makes long string which > become lengthy for next boards to add it in future. So we make > notation with <SOC_name>_<board_name> like sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts > does. In the case of Teres-I, this is an easily identifiable board, for which a simple google search can give you very easily what board it is and where you can get it. Yours fail for both, so I agree with Chen-Yu here. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
