On 21.02.2014 16:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go
ahead with the
following steps as an initial approach:
1. Have a common machine file for both exynos4 and 5 files,
mach-exynos-dt.c.
2. Introduce a generic compatible string "samsung,exynos".
3. Append this to the compatible property list for existing boards.
If this plan looks OK, I can send across patches doing this.
Looks good. I would also merge common.c with this resulting
mach-exynos-dt.c, as it would be the only user of the code there.
Sounds good. While the naming is not important, I would just call the
file 'exynos.c', in line with some of the other platforms we have.
Both the 'mach-' and the '-dt' part of the file name are redundant.
Alternatively, you could merge it all into common.c.
exynos.c sounds good to me.
One minor thing. It might be a good idea to base on top of my PM
consolidation part 2 series, to avoid merge conflicts:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/299340
It should hit Kgene's tree this weekend.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
