Re: [PATCH RFC] usb: gadget: Add xilinx axi usb2 device support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:41:03PM +0000, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> On 02/21/2014 01:04 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 06:23:13PM +0000, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:10:45PM +0530, Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta wrote:
> >>> This patch adds xilinx axi usb2 device driver support
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt         |   21 +
> >>>  drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig                         |   14 +
> >>>  drivers/usb/gadget/Makefile                        |    1 +
> >>>  drivers/usb/gadget/xilinx_udc.c                    | 2045 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  4 files changed, 2081 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt
> >>>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/gadget/xilinx_udc.c
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..acf03ab
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> >>> +Xilinx AXI USB2 device controller
> >>> +
> >>> +Required properties:
> >>> +- compatible		: Should be "xlnx,axi-usb2-device-4.00.a"
> > 
> > Is "axi-usb2-device" the official device name?
> 
> It is the name of IP which Xilinx have and we are using names in this format.
> 
> 
> >>> +- reg			: Physical base address and size of the Axi USB2
> >>> +			  device registers map.
> >>> +- interrupts		: Property with a value describing the interrupt
> >>> +			  number.
> > 
> > Does the device only have a single interrupt?
> 
> I believe so.
> 
> 
> >>> +- interrupt-parent	: Must be core interrupt controller
> > 
> > Is this strictly necessary?
> 
> I am not sure what do you mean by that. If you mean that interrupt-parent
> can be written to the root of DTS file then we can setup system with more
> interrupt controllers that's why it is required.

At which point it's not a required property of the node...

> If we can point to standard interrupt description then please point me to
> exact description you would like to see here and we can change it.

Unfortunately I'm not aware of a generic interrupts document. I just
don't see the point in each document listing interrupt-parent as a
requiredp roeprty when it's not. That said this is a trivial detail and
not really a blocker.

Cheers,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux