On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:49:05PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Two more comments: > > On Thursday 20 February 2014 10:15:54 Florian Fainelli wrote: > > +- clock-names: should contain "periph" for the functional clock > > I think we should really start standardizing on the clock names more. > We don't have any uart that calls its functional clock "periph" so > far. > > How about naming it "fclk" or "uart"? > > I'd actually prefer making it an anonymous clock, but I know that > will just trigger comments about what might happen if it turns > out we need more than one clock for a future version of this device. Yup ;) I'm happy as long as we have a well-defined name for each clock input, regardless of what those particular names might be. Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
