From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
According to Devicetree Specification v0.2 document:
"The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
of the device and not its precise programming model."
Do as suggested in the binding example.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,rtc-2123.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,rtc-2123.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,rtc-2123.txt
index 5cbc0b1..811124a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,rtc-2123.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,rtc-2123.txt
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Optional properties:
Example:
-rtc: nxp,rtc-pcf2123@3 {
+pcf2123: rtc@3 {
compatible = "nxp,rtc-pcf2123"
reg = <3>
spi-cs-high;
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
