On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 08:28:28AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Stephen, Rob,
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2018-04-18 07:50:01)
> >> The use of of_clk_get_parent_{count,name}() and of_clk_init() is not
> >> limited to clock providers.
> >>
> >> Hence move these helpers into their own header file, so callers that are
> >> not clock providers no longer have to include <linux/clk-provider.h>.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> v3:
> >> - Add Reviewed-by,
> >> - Add SPDX-License-Identifier,
> >> - Add to clock section in MAINTAINERS (note that Rob is still listed
> >> as a maintainer, too, due to the include/linux/of*.h catch-all
> >> rule),
> >
> > Can you X: out this file so Rob is happy? Or that doesn't work?
>
> I guess that should work.
>
> My point here is that due to the catch-all rule, he's listed as maintainer
> for of_{dma,gpio,irq,iommu,mdio,net,pci} too, which are all helpers for
> other subsystems. Perhaps these should be X'd-out too?
> Or is it OK without X-ing them out, as the clock maintainers are now shown, too?
>
> Rob: What's your preference?
It's fine as-is.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
