Hi,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c
> index 2022bdfa7ab4..0b26387c22e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
> #define PM8916_SUBTYPE 0x0b
> #define PM8004_SUBTYPE 0x0c
> #define PM8909_SUBTYPE 0x0d
> +#define PM8998_SUBTYPE 0x14
> +#define PMI8998_SUBTYPE 0x15
> +#define PM8005_SUBTYPE 0x18
I was being overly paranoid and double-checking these numbers. I
confirmed PMI8998 and PM8005 from the docs (yay!). The PM8998 docs
didn't have this, but I confirmed that I was talking to PM8998 by
confirming it was on the right USID and and then printing out the
value at probe time. All look good.
> static const struct of_device_id pmic_spmi_id_table[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic", .data = (void *)COMMON_SUBTYPE },
> @@ -54,7 +57,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id pmic_spmi_id_table[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994", .data = (void *)PMI8994_SUBTYPE },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pm8916", .data = (void *)PM8916_SUBTYPE },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pm8004", .data = (void *)PM8004_SUBTYPE },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998", .data = (void *)PMI8998_SUBTYPE },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,pm8005", .data = (void *)PM8005_SUBTYPE },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pm8909", .data = (void *)PM8909_SUBTYPE },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,pm8998", .data = (void *)PM8998_SUBTYPE },
nit: It appears that the above table was previously sorted by SUBTYPE
ID. Could you perhaps move your 3 new PMICs to the bottom to maintain
this? Other than that, you can add my Reviewed-by if you would like
(not that I have _any_ real expertise on SPMI, so might not be worth
it).
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
