On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:26:05PM +0530, Sandeep Panda wrote:
> Add support for TI's sn65dsi86 dsi2edp bridge chip.
> The chip converts DSI transmitted signal to eDP signal,
> which is fed to the connected eDP panel.
>
> This chip can be controlled via either i2c interface or
> dsi interface. Currently in driver all the control registers
> are being accessed through i2c interface only.
> Also as of now HPD support has not been added to bridge
> chip driver.
>
> Changes in v1:
> - Split the dt-bindings and the driver support into separate patches
> (Andrzej Hajda).
> - Use of gpiod APIs to parse and configure gpios instead of obsolete ones
> (Andrzej Hajda).
> - Use macros to define the register offsets (Andrzej Hajda).
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Separate out edp panel specific HW resource handling from bridge
> driver and create a separate edp panel drivers to handle panel
> specific mode information and HW resources (Sean Paul).
> - Replace pr_* APIs to DRM_* APIs to log error or debug information
> (Sean Paul).
> - Remove some of the unnecessary structure/variable from driver (Sean
> Paul).
> - Rename the function and structure prefix "sn65dsi86" to "ti_sn_bridge"
> (Sean Paul / Rob Herring).
> - Remove most of the hard-coding and modified the bridge init sequence
> based on current mode (Sean Paul).
> - Remove the existing function to retrieve the EDID data and
> implemented this as an i2c_adapter and use drm_get_edid() (Sean Paul).
> - Remove the dummy irq handler implementation, will add back the
> proper irq handling later (Sean Paul).
> - Capture the required enable gpios in a single array based on dt entry
> instead of having individual descriptor for each gpio (Sean Paul).
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Remove usage of irq_gpio and replace it as "interrupts" property (Rob
> Herring).
> - Remove the unnecessary header file inclusions (Sean Paul).
> - Rearrange the header files in alphabetical order (Sean Paul).
> - Use regmap interface to perform i2c transactions.
> - Update Copyright/License field and address other review comments
> (Jordan Crouse).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Panda <spanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 690 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What about Kconfig/Makefile?
> 1 file changed, 690 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a2a95f5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,690 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
Use SPDX license
> +
> +#include <drm/drmP.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/of_graph.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +
> +#define SN_BRIDGE_REVISION_ID 0x2
> +
> +/* Link Training specific registers */
> +#define SN_DEVICE_REV_REG 0x08
> +#define SN_REFCLK_FREQ_REG 0x0A
> +#define SN_DSI_LANES_REG 0x10
> +#define SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG 0x12
> +#define SN_ENH_FRAME_REG 0x5A
> +#define SN_SSC_CONFIG_REG 0x93
> +#define SN_DATARATE_CONFIG_REG 0x94
> +#define SN_PLL_ENABLE_REG 0x0D
> +#define SN_SCRAMBLE_CONFIG_REG 0x95
> +#define SN_AUX_WDATA0_REG 0x64
> +#define SN_AUX_ADDR_19_16_REG 0x74
> +#define SN_AUX_ADDR_15_8_REG 0x75
> +#define SN_AUX_ADDR_7_0_REG 0x76
> +#define SN_AUX_LENGTH_REG 0x77
> +#define SN_AUX_CMD_REG 0x78
> +#define SN_ML_TX_MODE_REG 0x96
> +/* video config specific registers */
> +#define SN_CHA_ACTIVE_LINE_LENGTH_LOW_REG 0x20
> +#define SN_CHA_ACTIVE_LINE_LENGTH_HIGH_REG 0x21
> +#define SN_CHA_VERTICAL_DISPLAY_SIZE_LOW_REG 0x24
> +#define SN_CHA_VERTICAL_DISPLAY_SIZE_HIGH_REG 0x25
> +#define SN_CHA_HSYNC_PULSE_WIDTH_LOW_REG 0x2C
> +#define SN_CHA_HSYNC_PULSE_WIDTH_HIGH_REG 0x2D
> +#define SN_CHA_VSYNC_PULSE_WIDTH_LOW_REG 0x30
> +#define SN_CHA_VSYNC_PULSE_WIDTH_HIGH_REG 0x31
> +#define SN_CHA_HORIZONTAL_BACK_PORCH_REG 0x34
> +#define SN_CHA_VERTICAL_BACK_PORCH_REG 0x36
> +#define SN_CHA_HORIZONTAL_FRONT_PORCH_REG 0x38
> +#define SN_CHA_VERTICAL_FRONT_PORCH_REG 0x3A
> +#define SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG 0x5B
> +
> +#define MIN_DSI_CLK_FREQ_MHZ 40
> +
> +#define DPPLL_CLK_SRC_REFCLK 0
> +#define DPPLL_CLK_SRC_DSICLK 1
> +
> +enum ti_sn_bridge_ref_clks {
> + SN_REF_CLK_12_MHZ = 0,
> + SN_REF_CLK_19_2_MHZ,
> + SN_REF_CLK_26_MHZ,
> + SN_REF_CLK_27_MHZ,
> + SN_REF_CLK_38_4_MHZ,
> + SN_REF_CLK_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +struct ti_sn_bridge {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct drm_bridge bridge;
> + struct drm_connector connector;
> + struct device_node *host_node;
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
> + /* handle to the connected eDP panel */
> + struct drm_panel *panel;
> + /* list of gpios needed to enable the bridge functionality */
> + struct gpio_descs *enable_gpios;
>From my reading of the datasheet, these gpios can be used for a variety of
things, not just tied to enable (input/output). So, separate enable input
from the gpios, and make the gpios configurable via dt.
> + int *value_array;
> + int intp_irq;
What's this used for?
> + unsigned int num_supplies;
> + struct regulator_bulk_data *supplies;
> + struct i2c_client *i2c_client;
> + struct i2c_adapter *ddc;
> + u32 num_modes;
> + struct drm_display_mode curr_mode;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_range ti_sn_bridge_volatile_ranges[] = {
> + { .range_min = 0, .range_max = 0xff },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_access_table ti_sn_bridge_volatile_table = {
> + .yes_ranges = ti_sn_bridge_volatile_ranges,
> + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_volatile_ranges),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config ti_sn_bridge_regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> + .volatile_table = &ti_sn_bridge_volatile_table,
> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> +};
> +
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_gpio_configure(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata, bool on)
> +{
> + int value, i = 0;
> +
> + value = on ? 1 : 0;
> +
> + if (pdata->enable_gpios->ndescs && pdata->value_array) {
> + for (i = 0; i < pdata->enable_gpios->ndescs; i++)
> + pdata->value_array[i] = value;
> + gpiod_set_array_value(pdata->enable_gpios->ndescs,
> + pdata->enable_gpios->desc, pdata->value_array);
> + }
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG("config to: %d\n", value);
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata, bool enable)
> +{
> + static int ref_count;
I'm a little confused why you chose a static variable instead of stashing this
in the pdata. Also, this isn't locked, so you will have races between setting
ref_count and doing the enable/disable.
> +
> + if (enable)
> + ref_count++;
> + else
> + ref_count--;
> +
> + if (enable && (ref_count == 1)) {
> + ti_sn_bridge_gpio_configure(pdata, true);
> +
> + if (regulator_bulk_enable(pdata->num_supplies,
> + pdata->supplies)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("bridge regulator enable failed\n");
> + return;
Why return void if you can fail?
> + }
> + } else if (!enable && !ref_count) {
> + regulator_bulk_disable(pdata->num_supplies, pdata->supplies);
> +
> + ti_sn_bridge_gpio_configure(pdata, false);
> + } else {
> + DRM_DEBUG("ti_sn_bridge power ctrl: %d refcount: %d\n",
> + enable, ref_count);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* Connector funcs */
> +static struct ti_sn_bridge *
> +connector_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> + return container_of(connector, struct ti_sn_bridge, connector);
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = connector_to_ti_sn_bridge(connector);
> + struct drm_panel *panel = pdata->panel;
> + struct edid *edid;
> +
> + if (panel) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("get mode from connected drm_panel\n");
> + pdata->num_modes = drm_panel_get_modes(panel);
Just return early instead of indenting the rest of the function.
> + } else {
> + /* get from EDID */
> + if (!pdata->ddc)
> + return 0;
> + ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, true);
> + edid = drm_get_edid(connector, pdata->ddc);
> + if (edid) {
> + drm_mode_connector_update_edid_property(connector,
> + edid);
> + pdata->num_modes = drm_add_edid_modes(connector, edid);
> + drm_edid_to_eld(connector, edid);
This is a static function inside drm_edid.c. How did this even compile?
> + kfree(edid);
> + } else {
> + DRM_DEBUG("failed to get edid\n");
Flip the if (edid) condition around and exit early.
> + }
> + ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, false);
> + }
> +
> + return pdata->num_modes;
> +}
> +
> +static enum drm_mode_status
> +ti_sn_bridge_connector_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> +{
> + /* maximum supported resolution is 4K at 60 fps */
> + if (mode->clock > 594000)
> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> +
> + return MODE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct drm_connector_helper_funcs ti_sn_bridge_connector_helper_funcs = {
> + .get_modes = ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes,
> + .mode_valid = ti_sn_bridge_connector_mode_valid,
> +};
> +
> +static enum drm_connector_status
> +ti_sn_bridge_connector_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = connector_to_ti_sn_bridge(connector);
> +
> + /**
> + * TODO: Currently if drm_panel is present, then always
> + * return the status as connected. Need to add support to detect
> + * device state for no panel(hot pluggable) scenarios.
Perhaps then you should return unknown instead of disconnected.
> + */
> + if (pdata->panel)
> + return connector_status_connected;
> + else
> + return connector_status_disconnected;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct drm_connector_funcs ti_sn_bridge_connector_funcs = {
> + .fill_modes = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes,
> + .detect = ti_sn_bridge_connector_detect,
> + .destroy = drm_connector_cleanup,
> + .reset = drm_atomic_helper_connector_reset,
> + .atomic_duplicate_state = drm_atomic_helper_connector_duplicate_state,
> + .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_connector_destroy_state,
> +};
> +
> +static struct ti_sn_bridge *bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + return container_of(bridge, struct ti_sn_bridge, bridge);
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_read_device_rev(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> + unsigned int rev = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_DEVICE_REV_REG, &rev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
Why do you need a label just to return?
> +
> + if (rev == SN_BRIDGE_REVISION_ID) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("ti_sn_bridge revision id: 0x%x\n", rev);
The revision is hardcoded, so this print isn't really useful.
> + } else {
> + DRM_ERROR("ti_sn_bridge revision id: 0x%x mismatch\n", rev);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> +exit:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const char * const ti_sn_bridge_supply_names[] = {
> + "vccio",
> + "vcca",
> +};
> +
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_parse_regulators(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + pdata->num_supplies = ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_supply_names);
> +
> + pdata->supplies = devm_kcalloc(pdata->dev, pdata->num_supplies,
> + sizeof(*pdata->supplies), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata->supplies)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_supplies; i++)
> + pdata->supplies[i].supply = ti_sn_bridge_supply_names[i];
> +
> + return devm_regulator_bulk_get(pdata->dev,
> + pdata->num_supplies, pdata->supplies);
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_attach_panel(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> + struct device_node *panel_node, *port, *endpoint;
> +
> + pdata->panel = NULL;
> + port = of_graph_get_port_by_id(pdata->dev->of_node, 1);
> + if (port) {
> + endpoint = of_get_child_by_name(port, "endpoint");
> + of_node_put(port);
> + if (!endpoint) {
> + dev_err(pdata->dev, "no output endpoint found\n");
Why are you switching to dev_err?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + panel_node = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint);
> + of_node_put(endpoint);
> + if (!panel_node) {
> + dev_err(pdata->dev, "no output node found\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + pdata->panel = of_drm_find_panel(panel_node);
> + of_node_put(panel_node);
> + if (!pdata->panel) {
> + dev_err(pdata->dev, "no panel node found\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + drm_panel_attach(pdata->panel, &pdata->connector);
Why is this outside the if statement? If port is NULL, then pdata->panel is
NULL, and the first thing drm_panel_attach does is dereference panel.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct mipi_dsi_host *host;
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
> + int ret;
> + const struct mipi_dsi_device_info info = { .type = "ti_sn_bridge",
> + .channel = 0,
> + .node = NULL,
> + };
> +
> + if (!bridge->encoder) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Parent encoder object not found\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> + /* HPD not supported */
> + pdata->connector.polled = 0;
> +
> + ret = drm_connector_init(bridge->dev, &pdata->connector,
> + &ti_sn_bridge_connector_funcs,
> + DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP);
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to initialize connector with drm\n");
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> + drm_connector_helper_add(&pdata->connector,
> + &ti_sn_bridge_connector_helper_funcs);
> + drm_mode_connector_attach_encoder(&pdata->connector, bridge->encoder);
> +
> + host = of_find_mipi_dsi_host_by_node(pdata->host_node);
> + if (!host) {
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to find dsi host\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> + dsi = mipi_dsi_device_register_full(host, &info);
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to create dsi device\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(dsi);
> + goto error;
All of these error labels just return ret. So, why not just return directly?
> + }
> +
> + /* TODO: setting to 4 lanes always for now */
> + dsi->lanes = 4;
> + dsi->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888;
> + dsi->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE |
> + MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_HSE;
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_attach(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to attach dsi to host\n");
> + goto err_dsi_attach;
> + }
> +
> + pdata->dsi = dsi;
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG("bridge attached\n");
> + /* attach panel to bridge */
> + ti_sn_bridge_attach_panel(pdata);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_dsi_attach:
> + mipi_dsi_device_unregister(dsi);
> +error:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> + struct drm_display_mode *adj_mode)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG("mode_set: hdisplay=%d, vdisplay=%d, vrefresh=%d, clock=%d\n",
> + adj_mode->hdisplay, adj_mode->vdisplay,
> + adj_mode->vrefresh, adj_mode->clock);
> +
> + drm_mode_copy(&pdata->curr_mode, adj_mode);
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
> + struct drm_panel *panel = pdata->panel;
> +
> + if (panel) {
> + drm_panel_disable(panel);
> + drm_panel_unprepare(panel);
> + }
> +
> + ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
> + struct drm_panel *panel = pdata->panel;
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode = &pdata->curr_mode;
> + unsigned int bit_rate_mhz, clk_freq_mhz;
> + unsigned int val = 0;
> +
> + if (!pdata->num_modes)
> + return;
This relies on get_modes() to be called before enable, which is not guaranteed
(user defined modes). You also are racing with get_modes(), so it's possible
this is inaccurate anyways. Is there a good reason to gate enable on num_modes?
> +
> + ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, true);
> +
> + if (panel)
> + drm_panel_prepare(panel);
> +
> + /* CLK_SRC config */
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_REFCLK_FREQ_REG,
> + (DPPLL_CLK_SRC_REFCLK | (SN_REF_CLK_19_2_MHZ << 0x1)));
> +
> + /* DSI_A lane config */
> + regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_DSI_LANES_REG, &val);
> + val |= ((0x4 - pdata->dsi->lanes) & 0x03) << 0x3;
These masks should be #defined, and imo the 4 would read better if it were not
listed in hex. Same goes below, masks and offsets need to be #defined.
You're also doing a bitwise OR on the current value of lanes. So since the
default value is 0x3, you'll never actually change anything. You need to clear
the current value before setting the new value. This applies below as well.
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSI_LANES_REG, val);
> +
> + /* DP lane config */
> + regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_SSC_CONFIG_REG, &val);
> + val |= ((pdata->dsi->lanes - 0x1) & 0x03) << 0x4;
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_SSC_CONFIG_REG, val);
> +
> + /* set dsi clk frequency value */
> + bit_rate_mhz = (mode->clock / 1000) *
> + mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(pdata->dsi->format);
> + clk_freq_mhz = bit_rate_mhz / (pdata->dsi->lanes * 2);
> + /* for each increment in val, frequency increases by 5MHz */
> + val = (MIN_DSI_CLK_FREQ_MHZ / 0x5) +
> + (((clk_freq_mhz - MIN_DSI_CLK_FREQ_MHZ) / 0x5) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
> +
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DATARATE_CONFIG_REG, 0x80); /* set HBR */
This should also be a function of the pclk, right?
> +
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_PLL_ENABLE_REG, 0x1); /* Enable PLL */
> + usleep_range(10000, 10050);
> +
> + /* DPCD Register 0x0010A in Sink */
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_WDATA0_REG, 0x01);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_ADDR_19_16_REG, 0x00);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_ADDR_15_8_REG, 0x01);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_ADDR_7_0_REG, 0x0A);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_LENGTH_REG, 0x01);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_REG, 0x81);
What are you doing here and why?
> + usleep_range(10000, 10050);
> +
> + /* Semi auto link training mode */
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_ML_TX_MODE_REG, 0x0A);
> + usleep_range(20000, 20050);
You should use msleep if you need to sleep for ~20ms
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt
> +
> + /* config video parameters */
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_ACTIVE_LINE_LENGTH_LOW_REG,
> + mode->hdisplay & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_ACTIVE_LINE_LENGTH_HIGH_REG,
> + (mode->hdisplay >> 0x8) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_VERTICAL_DISPLAY_SIZE_LOW_REG,
> + mode->vdisplay & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_VERTICAL_DISPLAY_SIZE_HIGH_REG,
> + (mode->vdisplay >> 0x8) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_HSYNC_PULSE_WIDTH_LOW_REG,
> + (mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_HSYNC_PULSE_WIDTH_HIGH_REG,
> + ((mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start) >> 0x8) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_VSYNC_PULSE_WIDTH_LOW_REG,
> + (mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_VSYNC_PULSE_WIDTH_HIGH_REG,
> + ((mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start) >> 0x8) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_HORIZONTAL_BACK_PORCH_REG,
> + (mode->htotal - mode->hsync_end) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_VERTICAL_BACK_PORCH_REG,
> + (mode->vtotal - mode->vsync_end) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_HORIZONTAL_FRONT_PORCH_REG,
> + (mode->hsync_start - mode->hdisplay) & 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_VERTICAL_FRONT_PORCH_REG,
> + (mode->vsync_start - mode->vdisplay) & 0xFF);
> + if (pdata->dsi->format == MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888)
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, 0x00);
> + else
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG, 0x01);
The format is hardcoded above.
> + usleep_range(10000, 10050);
> +
> + /* enable video stream */
> + regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_ENH_FRAME_REG, &val);
> + val |= BIT(3);
> + regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_ENH_FRAME_REG, val);
> +
> + if (panel)
> + drm_panel_enable(panel);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
> + .attach = ti_sn_bridge_attach,
> + .enable = ti_sn_bridge_enable,
> + .disable = ti_sn_bridge_disable,
> + .mode_set = ti_sn_bridge_mode_set,
> +};
> +
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_parse_gpios(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + pdata->enable_gpios = devm_gpiod_get_array(pdata->dev,
> + "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(pdata->enable_gpios)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to get enable gpio from DT\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(pdata->enable_gpios);
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + /* initialize the value array */
> + pdata->value_array = kmalloc(pdata->enable_gpios->ndescs * sizeof(int),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata->value_array) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + memset(pdata->value_array, 0,
> + pdata->enable_gpios->ndescs * sizeof(int));
> +
> +exit:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_parse_dsi_host(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = pdata->dev->of_node;
> + struct device_node *end_node;
> +
> + end_node = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(np, 0, 0);
> + if (!end_node) {
> + DRM_ERROR("remote endpoint not found\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + pdata->host_node = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(end_node);
> + of_node_put(end_node);
> + if (!pdata->host_node) {
> + DRM_ERROR("remote node not found\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + of_node_put(pdata->host_node);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata;
> + struct device_node *ddc_node;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("device doesn't support I2C\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev,
> + sizeof(struct ti_sn_bridge), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pdata->dev = &client->dev;
> + pdata->i2c_client = client;
> + pdata->intp_irq = client->irq;
> + DRM_DEBUG("I2C address is %x\n", client->addr);
> +
> + pdata->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client,
> + &ti_sn_bridge_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(pdata->regmap))
> + return PTR_ERR(pdata->regmap);
> +
> + ret = ti_sn_bridge_parse_dsi_host(pdata);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_dt_parse;
> +
> + ret = ti_sn_bridge_parse_gpios(pdata);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_dt_parse;
> +
> + ret = ti_sn_bridge_parse_regulators(pdata);
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to parse regulators\n");
> + goto err_reg_parse;
> + }
> +
> + ddc_node = of_parse_phandle(pdata->dev->of_node, "ddc-i2c-bus", 0);
> + if (ddc_node) {
> + pdata->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc_node);
> + of_node_put(ddc_node);
> + if (!pdata->ddc) {
> + dev_dbg(pdata->dev, "failed to read ddc node\n");
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + }
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(pdata->dev, "no ddc property found\n");
> + }
> +
> + ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, true);
> + ret = ti_sn_bridge_read_device_rev(pdata);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_config;
> + ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, false);
> +
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, pdata);
> + dev_set_drvdata(&client->dev, pdata);
drvdata doesn't seem to be used anywhere.
> +
> + pdata->bridge.funcs = &ti_sn_bridge_funcs;
> + pdata->bridge.of_node = client->dev.of_node;
> +
> + drm_bridge_add(&pdata->bridge);
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> +err_config:
> + ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, false);
Just turn it off before you check ret (similar to the of_node_put calls
throughout the driver).
> +err_reg_parse:
> + kfree(pdata->value_array);
> +err_dt_parse:
> + devm_kfree(&client->dev, pdata);
If it's device managed, you don't need explicit frees.
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> + if (!pdata)
> + goto end;
> +
> + mipi_dsi_detach(pdata->dsi);
> + mipi_dsi_device_unregister(pdata->dsi);
> +
> + ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, false);
If you want to refcount power_ctrl, you'll need to make sure that it's
_actually_ off.
> + kfree(pdata->value_array);
> +
> + drm_bridge_remove(&pdata->bridge);
> + i2c_put_adapter(pdata->ddc);
> +
> + devm_kfree(&client->dev, pdata);
> +
> +end:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct i2c_device_id ti_sn_bridge_id[] = {
> + { "ti,sn65dsi86", 0},
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ti_sn_bridge_id);
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id ti_sn_bridge_match_table[] = {
> + {.compatible = "ti,sn65dsi86"},
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_sn_bridge_match_table);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver ti_sn_bridge_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "ti_sn65dsi86",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = ti_sn_bridge_match_table,
> + },
> + .probe = ti_sn_bridge_probe,
> + .remove = ti_sn_bridge_remove,
> + .id_table = ti_sn_bridge_id,
> +};
> +
> +module_i2c_driver(ti_sn_bridge_driver);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("sn65dsi86 DSI to eDP bridge driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
GPL v2?
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
