Hi Mani,
Am 03.04.2018 um 19:00 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 12:16:49AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
>> <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> +static const struct pinconf_ops owl_pinconf_ops = {
>>> + .is_generic = true,
>>> + .pin_config_get = owl_pin_config_get,
>>> + .pin_config_set = owl_pin_config_set,
>>> + .pin_config_group_get = owl_group_config_get,
>>> + .pin_config_group_set = owl_group_config_set
>>
>> It's still good idea to leave comma here...
>>
>
> I'm confused. What is the criteria for removing/keeping comma for last member
> of struct? I followed your gpio driver suggestion.
No comma for list terminator ("{}") because nothing goes after it; comma
whenever it allows adding a new line without touching the old one, i.e.
keeping future diff small.
Cheers,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
