On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 19:50 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > Update fsl-fec to explicitly list the supported compatible strings > and add missing 'clocks' and 'clock-names' properties. It does not > change anything about how kernel drive works. Instead, it just reflects > how kernel driver works today. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt > index 845ff84..3ebd395 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-fec.txt > @@ -1,9 +1,26 @@ > * Freescale Fast Ethernet Controller (FEC) > > Required properties: > -- compatible : Should be "fsl,<soc>-fec" > +- compatible : Should contain one of the following: > + "fsl,imx25-fec" > + "fsl,imx27-fec" > + "fsl,imx28-fec" > + "fsl,imx6q-fec" > + "fsl,mvf600-fec" This appears to miss all the PowerPC based SoCs. See git grep 'fsl,.*-fec' arch/*/boot/dts > - reg : Address and length of the register set for the device > - interrupts : Should contain fec interrupt > +- clocks: phandle to the clocks feeding the FEC controller and phy. The > + following two are required: > + - "ipg": the peripheral access clock > + - "ahb": the bus clock for MAC > + The following two are optional: > + - "ptp": the sampling clock for PTP (IEEE 1588). On SoC like i.MX6Q, > + the clock could come from either the internal clock control module > + or external oscillator via pad depending on board design. > + - "enet_out": the phy reference clock provided by SoC via pad, which > + is available on SoC like i.MX28. > +- clock-names: Must contain the clock names described just above > + Listing 'clocks' under the "required properties" all of a sudden invalidates existing device trees, if they don't carry the property which before the change was not required, not even documented. The PowerPC based chips probably have differing sets of clocks. I'm aware of the MPC512x, where one "per" clock is sufficient, and even this spec is optional. Other machines may not have yet been converted to CCF. Your description needs to get rephrased, it triggers Mark Rutland's regular "clocks are not just phandles" reply. See how he suggested quite a few times a better wording. virtually yours Gerhard Sittig -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@xxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html