Re: [PATCH 4/8] clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/21/2018 11:08 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
2018-03-21 17:01 GMT+01:00 David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 03/21/2018 07:08 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

In order to be able to use the reset framework in legacy boot mode as
well, add the reset lookup table to the psc driver for da850 variant.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c | 8 ++++++++
   drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c       | 1 +
   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
index ccc7eb17bf3a..395db4b2c0ee 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
    */
     #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
   #include <linux/clk.h>
   #include <linux/clkdev.h>
   #include <linux/init.h>
@@ -66,8 +67,15 @@ LPSC_CLKDEV3(ecap_clkdev,    "fck",  "ecap.0",
                                 "fck",  "ecap.1",
                                 "fck",  "ecap.2");
   +static struct reset_control_lookup da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table[] = {
+       RESET_LOOKUP("davinci-rproc.0", NULL, 15),
+};
+
   static int da850_psc0_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
   {
+       reset_controller_add_lookup("da850-psc0",
+                                   da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table,
+
ARRAY_SIZE(da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table));


Could there be a race condition here since you are adding the lookup
*before*
you are adding the actual provider? It seems like
reset_controller_add_lookup()
should be after davinci_psc_register_clocks().


I don't think so, because reset_controller_add_lookup() only adds the
lookup structure to the list in reset/core.c. The actual reset
controller struct is only located and used when reset_control_get_*()
is called, so after probing the user. And it's all protected with
mutexes.

This made me think though - maybe if we can't locate the controller,
we should return -EPROBE_DEFER from probe in davinci-rproc?

Bart


Yes, especially since we know that the PSC driver itself does get
deferred already.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux