Воскресенье, 16 февраля 2014, 18:56 +08:00 от Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 04:38:44PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > @@ -56,6 +59,55 @@ static const struct of_device_id weim_id_table[] = {
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, weim_id_table);
> >
> > +static int __init imx6q_weim_gpr_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > + struct property *prop;
> > + const __be32 *p;
> > + struct regmap *gpr;
> > + u32 gprvals[4] = {
> > + 05, /* CS0(128M) CS1(0M) CS2(0M) CS3(0M) */
> > + 033, /* CS0(64M) CS1(64M) CS2(0M) CS3(0M) */
> > + 0113, /* CS0(64M) CS1(32M) CS2(32M) CS3(0M) */
> > + 01111, /* CS0(64M) CS1(32M) CS2(32M) CS3(0M) */
> > + };
> > + u32 gprval = 0;
> > + u32 val;
> > + int cs = 0;
> > + int i = 0;
> > +
> > + gpr = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("fsl,imx6q-iomuxc-gpr");
>
> When trying to improve the bindings doc imx-weim.txt, I checked hardware
> manuals and found that SoCs imx50, imx53, imx6q, imx6dl and imx6sl all
> need the same CS GPR setup. It's inappropriate to look up by hard-coded
> compatible "fsl,imx6q-iomuxc-gpr" then. So I'm going to add the
> property fsl,weim-cs-gpr back, and update bindings doc accordingly.
You can add additional call into struct imx_weim_devtype for handle
soc-specific stuff.
---
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
