On Sat, 15 Feb 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 15 February 2014, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > None of the _defconfig's ever turn on > > CACHE_FEROCEON_L2_WRITETHROUGH. I also did a quick google and could > > not find any usage of it. > > > > So i see two options: > > > > 1) Remove the wr-override from the DT binding and use > > CACHE_FEROCEON_L2_WRITETHROUGH. > > > > 2) Remove CACHE_FEROCEON_L2_WRITETHROUGH and make proc-feroceon.S do > > the right thing at runtime. > > > > I suspect i will go for 1), it is simpler. > > Yes, fair enough. I'd hope we could just kill the option altogether, > but it's probably hard to find anyone who would remember what it > was introduced for, unless Nico knows. There was a time when we didn't know what cache mode was the best performance wise. The right answer is "it depends on the work load" of course. Hence it was made optional for people to play with and choose for themselves. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
