On Tue 2018-03-06 13:54:16, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 01:40:02PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.txt | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.txt > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..8a86f346d550 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ > > > +Device tree configuration for PECI buses on the AST24XX and AST25XX SoCs. > > > > Are these SoCs x86-based? > > ARM, as far as i can tell. If i get the architecture correct, these > are BMC, Board Management Controllers, looking after the main x86 CPU, > stopping it overheating, controlling the power supplies, remote > management, etc. Ok, so with x86 machine, I get arm-based one for free. I get it. Is user able to run his own kernel on the arm system, or is it locked down, TiVo style? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
