On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:33:52 +0000
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add two new ioctl for VFIO containers. VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS creates a
> bond between a container and a process address space, identified by a
> device-specific ID named PASID. This allows the device to target DMA
> transactions at the process virtual addresses without a need for mapping
> and unmapping buffers explicitly in the IOMMU. The process page tables are
> shared with the IOMMU, and mechanisms such as PCI ATS/PRI are used to
> handle faults. VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND_PROCESS removes a bond created with
> VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 399 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 76 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 475 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index e30e29ae4819..cac066f0026b 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
> #include <linux/rbtree.h>
> #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_hugepages,
>
> struct vfio_iommu {
> struct list_head domain_list;
> + struct list_head mm_list;
> struct vfio_domain *external_domain; /* domain for external user */
> struct mutex lock;
> struct rb_root dma_list;
> @@ -90,6 +92,15 @@ struct vfio_dma {
> struct vfio_group {
> struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
> struct list_head next;
> + bool sva_enabled;
> +};
> +
> +struct vfio_mm {
> +#define VFIO_PASID_INVALID (-1)
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + int pasid;
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + struct list_head next;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -1117,6 +1128,157 @@ static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int vfio_iommu_mm_exit(struct device *dev, int pasid, void *data)
> +{
> + struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm = data;
> +
> + /*
> + * The mm_exit callback cannot block, so we can't take the iommu mutex
> + * and remove this vfio_mm from the list. Hopefully the SVA code will
> + * relax its locking requirement in the future.
> + *
> + * We mostly care about attach_group, which will attempt to replay all
> + * binds in this container. Ensure that it doesn't touch this defunct mm
> + * struct, by clearing the pointer. The structure will be freed when the
> + * group is removed from the container.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&vfio_mm->lock);
> + vfio_mm->mm = NULL;
> + spin_unlock(&vfio_mm->lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_sva_init(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> +
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = iommu_sva_device_init(dev, IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_PASID |
> + IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_IOPF, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return iommu_register_mm_exit_handler(dev, vfio_iommu_mm_exit);
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_sva_shutdown(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + iommu_sva_device_shutdown(dev);
> + iommu_unregister_mm_exit_handler(dev);
Typically the order would be reverse of the setup, is it correct this
way?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_bind_group(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + struct vfio_group *group,
> + struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int pasid;
> +
> + if (!group->sva_enabled) {
> + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(group->iommu_group, NULL,
> + vfio_iommu_sva_init);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Seems were at an unknown state here, do we need to undo any that
succeeded?
> +
> + group->sva_enabled = true;
> + }
> +
> + ret = iommu_sva_bind_group(group->iommu_group, vfio_mm->mm, &pasid,
> + IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_PASID | IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_IOPF,
> + vfio_mm);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(vfio_mm->pasid != VFIO_PASID_INVALID && pasid !=
> + vfio_mm->pasid))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + vfio_mm->pasid = pasid;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_iommu_unbind_group(struct vfio_group *group,
> + struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm)
> +{
> + iommu_sva_unbind_group(group->iommu_group, vfio_mm->pasid);
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_iommu_unbind(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm)
> +{
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> + struct vfio_domain *domain;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(domain, &iommu->domain_list, next)
> + list_for_each_entry(group, &domain->group_list, next)
> + vfio_iommu_unbind_group(group, vfio_mm);
> +}
> +
> +static bool vfio_mm_get(struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm)
> +{
> + bool ret;
> +
> + spin_lock(&vfio_mm->lock);
> + ret = vfio_mm->mm && mmget_not_zero(vfio_mm->mm);
> + spin_unlock(&vfio_mm->lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm)
> +{
> + mmput(vfio_mm->mm);
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_replay_bind(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_group *group)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(vfio_mm, &iommu->mm_list, next) {
> + /*
> + * Ensure mm doesn't exit while we're binding it to the new
> + * group.
> + */
> + if (!vfio_mm_get(vfio_mm))
> + continue;
> + ret = vfio_iommu_bind_group(iommu, group, vfio_mm);
> + vfio_mm_put(vfio_mm);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unbind;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_unbind:
> + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(vfio_mm, &iommu->mm_list, next) {
> + if (!vfio_mm_get(vfio_mm))
> + continue;
> + iommu_sva_unbind_group(group->iommu_group, vfio_mm->pasid);
> + vfio_mm_put(vfio_mm);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_iommu_free_all_mm(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm, *tmp;
> +
> + /*
> + * No need for unbind() here. Since all groups are detached from this
> + * iommu, bonds have been removed.
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(vfio_mm, tmp, &iommu->mm_list, next)
> + kfree(vfio_mm);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->mm_list);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * We change our unmap behavior slightly depending on whether the IOMMU
> * supports fine-grained superpages. IOMMUs like AMD-Vi will use a superpage
> @@ -1301,6 +1463,15 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> d->prot == domain->prot) {
> iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, iommu_group);
> if (!iommu_attach_group(d->domain, iommu_group)) {
> + if (vfio_iommu_replay_bind(iommu, group)) {
> + iommu_detach_group(d->domain, iommu_group);
> + ret = iommu_attach_group(domain->domain,
> + iommu_group);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_domain;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> list_add(&group->next, &d->group_list);
> iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> kfree(domain);
> @@ -1321,6 +1492,10 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> if (ret)
> goto out_detach;
>
> + ret = vfio_iommu_replay_bind(iommu, group);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_detach;
> +
> if (resv_msi) {
> ret = iommu_get_msi_cookie(domain->domain, resv_msi_base);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1426,6 +1601,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
> continue;
>
> iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, iommu_group);
> + if (group->sva_enabled) {
> + iommu_group_for_each_dev(iommu_group, NULL,
> + vfio_iommu_sva_shutdown);
> + group->sva_enabled = false;
> + }
> list_del(&group->next);
> kfree(group);
> /*
> @@ -1441,6 +1621,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
> vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
> else
> vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(iommu);
> + vfio_iommu_free_all_mm(iommu);
> }
> iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> list_del(&domain->next);
> @@ -1475,6 +1656,7 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
> }
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->domain_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->mm_list);
> iommu->dma_list = RB_ROOT;
> mutex_init(&iommu->lock);
> BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&iommu->notifier);
> @@ -1509,6 +1691,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_release(void *iommu_data)
> kfree(iommu->external_domain);
> }
>
> + vfio_iommu_free_all_mm(iommu);
> vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(domain, domain_tmp,
> @@ -1537,6 +1720,184 @@ static int vfio_domains_have_iommu_cache(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static struct mm_struct *vfio_iommu_get_mm_by_vpid(pid_t vpid)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + struct task_struct *task;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + task = find_task_by_vpid(vpid);
> + if (task)
> + get_task_struct(task);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (!task)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
> +
> + /* Ensure that current has RW access on the mm */
> + mm = mm_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS);
> + put_task_struct(task);
> +
> + if (!mm)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
> +
> + return mm;
> +}
> +
> +static long vfio_iommu_type1_bind_process(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + void __user *arg,
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind *bind)
> +{
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind_process params;
> + struct vfio_domain *domain;
> + struct vfio_group *group;
> + struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm;
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + unsigned long minsz;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + minsz = sizeof(*bind) + sizeof(params);
> + if (bind->argsz < minsz)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + arg += sizeof(*bind);
> + if (copy_from_user(¶ms, arg, sizeof(params)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (params.flags & ~VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PID)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (params.flags & VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PID) {
> + mm = vfio_iommu_get_mm_by_vpid(params.pid);
> + if (IS_ERR(mm))
> + return PTR_ERR(mm);
> + } else {
> + mm = get_task_mm(current);
> + if (!mm)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> + if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_mm;
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(vfio_mm, &iommu->mm_list, next) {
> + if (vfio_mm->mm != mm)
> + continue;
> +
> + params.pasid = vfio_mm->pasid;
> +
> + ret = copy_to_user(arg, ¶ms, sizeof(params)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> + goto out_put_mm;
> + }
> +
> + vfio_mm = kzalloc(sizeof(*vfio_mm), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vfio_mm) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_put_mm;
> + }
> +
> + vfio_mm->mm = mm;
> + vfio_mm->pasid = VFIO_PASID_INVALID;
> + spin_lock_init(&vfio_mm->lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(domain, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> + list_for_each_entry(group, &domain->group_list, next) {
> + ret = vfio_iommu_bind_group(iommu, group, vfio_mm);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + }
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + /* Undo all binds that already succeeded */
> + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(group, &domain->group_list,
> + next)
> + vfio_iommu_unbind_group(group, vfio_mm);
> + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(domain, &iommu->domain_list,
> + next)
> + list_for_each_entry(group, &domain->group_list, next)
> + vfio_iommu_unbind_group(group, vfio_mm);
> + kfree(vfio_mm);
> + } else {
> + list_add(&vfio_mm->next, &iommu->mm_list);
> +
> + params.pasid = vfio_mm->pasid;
> + ret = copy_to_user(arg, ¶ms, sizeof(params)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> + if (ret) {
> + vfio_iommu_unbind(iommu, vfio_mm);
> + kfree(vfio_mm);
> + }
> + }
> +
> +out_put_mm:
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + mmput(mm);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static long vfio_iommu_type1_unbind_process(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + void __user *arg,
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind *bind)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + unsigned long minsz;
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm;
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind_process params;
> +
> + minsz = sizeof(*bind) + sizeof(params);
> + if (bind->argsz < minsz)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + arg += sizeof(*bind);
> + if (copy_from_user(¶ms, arg, sizeof(params)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (params.flags & ~VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PID)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * We can't simply unbind a foreign process by PASID, because the
> + * process might have died and the PASID might have been reallocated to
> + * another process. Instead we need to fetch that process mm by PID
> + * again to make sure we remove the right vfio_mm. In addition, holding
> + * the mm guarantees that mm_users isn't dropped while we unbind and the
> + * exit_mm handler doesn't fire. While not strictly necessary, not
> + * having to care about that race simplifies everyone's life.
> + */
> + if (params.flags & VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PID) {
> + mm = vfio_iommu_get_mm_by_vpid(params.pid);
> + if (IS_ERR(mm))
> + return PTR_ERR(mm);
I don't understand how this works for a process that has exited, the
mm_exit function gets called to clear vfio_mm.mm, the above may or may
not work (could be new ptrace'able process with same pid), but it won't
match the mm below, so is the vfio_mm that mm_exit zapped forever stuck
in this list until the container is destroyed?
> + } else {
> + mm = get_task_mm(current);
> + if (!mm)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = -ESRCH;
> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(vfio_mm, &iommu->mm_list, next) {
> + if (vfio_mm->mm != mm)
> + continue;
> +
> + vfio_iommu_unbind(iommu, vfio_mm);
> + list_del(&vfio_mm->next);
> + kfree(vfio_mm);
> + ret = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + mmput(mm);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> {
> @@ -1607,6 +1968,44 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>
> return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &unmap, minsz) ?
> -EFAULT : 0;
> +
> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_BIND) {
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind bind;
> +
> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind, mode);
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&bind, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (bind.argsz < minsz)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + switch (bind.mode) {
> + case VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS:
> + return vfio_iommu_type1_bind_process(iommu, (void *)arg,
> + &bind);
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND) {
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind bind;
> +
> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind, mode);
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&bind, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (bind.argsz < minsz)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + switch (bind.mode) {
> + case VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS:
> + return vfio_iommu_type1_unbind_process(iommu, (void *)arg,
> + &bind);
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> return -ENOTTY;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index c74372163ed2..e1b9b8c58916 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -638,6 +638,82 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap {
> #define VFIO_IOMMU_ENABLE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 15)
> #define VFIO_IOMMU_DISABLE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 16)
>
> +/*
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS
> + *
> + * Allocate a PASID for a process address space, and use it to attach this
> + * process to all devices in the container. Devices can then tag their DMA
> + * traffic with the returned @pasid to perform transactions on the associated
> + * virtual address space. Mapping and unmapping buffers is performed by standard
> + * functions such as mmap and malloc.
> + *
> + * If flag is VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PID, @pid contains the pid of a foreign process to
> + * bind. Otherwise the current task is bound. Given that the caller owns the
> + * device, setting this flag grants the caller read and write permissions on the
> + * entire address space of foreign process described by @pid. Therefore,
> + * permission to perform the bind operation on a foreign process is governed by
> + * the ptrace access mode PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS check. See man ptrace(2)
> + * for more information.
> + *
> + * On success, VFIO writes a Process Address Space ID (PASID) into @pasid. This
> + * ID is unique to a process and can be used on all devices in the container.
> + *
> + * On fork, the child inherits the device fd and can use the bonds setup by its
> + * parent. Consequently, the child has R/W access on the address spaces bound by
> + * its parent. After an execv, the device fd is closed and the child doesn't
> + * have access to the address space anymore.
> + *
> + * To remove a bond between process and container, VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND ioctl is
> + * issued with the same parameters. If a pid was specified in VFIO_IOMMU_BIND,
> + * it should also be present for VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND. Otherwise unbind the current
> + * task from the container.
> + */
> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind_process {
> + __u32 flags;
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PID (1 << 0)
> + __u32 pasid;
> + __s32 pid;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Only mode supported at the moment is VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS, which takes
> + * vfio_iommu_type1_bind_process in data.
> + */
> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind {
> + __u32 argsz;
> + __u32 mode;
s/mode/flags/
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS (1 << 0)
> + __u8 data[];
> +};
I'm not convinced having a separate vfio_iommu_type1_bind_process
struct is necessary. It seems like we always expect to return a pasid,
only the pid is optional, but that could be handled by a single
structure with a flag bit to indicate a pid bind is requested.
> +
> +/*
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_BIND - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 22, struct vfio_iommu_bind)
vfio_iommu_type1_bind
> + *
> + * Manage address spaces of devices in this container. Initially a TYPE1
> + * container can only have one address space, managed with
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_MAP/UNMAP_DMA.
> + *
> + * An IOMMU of type VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU can be managed by both MAP/UNMAP
> + * and BIND ioctls at the same time. MAP/UNMAP acts on the stage-2 (host) page
> + * tables, and BIND manages the stage-1 (guest) page tables. Other types of
> + * IOMMU may allow MAP/UNMAP and BIND to coexist, where MAP/UNMAP controls
> + * non-PASID traffic and BIND controls PASID traffic. But this depends on the
> + * underlying IOMMU architecture and isn't guaranteed.
> + *
> + * Availability of this feature depends on the device, its bus, the underlying
> + * IOMMU and the CPU architecture.
> + *
> + * returns: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> + */
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_BIND _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 22)
> +
> +/*
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 23, struct vfio_iommu_bind)
vifo_iommu_type1_bind
> + *
> + * Undo what was done by the corresponding VFIO_IOMMU_BIND ioctl.
> + */
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 23)
> +
> /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */
>
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
