On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:11:32PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Trigger type needs to be IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH since the interrupt
> signal gets inverted by the PMC (configured by the invert-interrupt
> property).
Isn't the reason the other way around? The PMIC generates a low-level
interrupt, but the GIC can only be configured to accept high-level (or
rising edge) and therefore the nvidia,invert-interrupt property needs to
be set in the PMC node?
One nitpick below.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts
[...]
> @@ -888,8 +888,9 @@
> palmas: tps65913@58 {
> compatible = "ti,palmas";
> reg = <0x58>;
> - interrupts = <0 86 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>
> + /* active-low configured by PMC invert-interrupt */
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 86 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
I'd prefer to keep the properties grouped as before. interrupts is a
"client" property, whereas #interrupt-cells and interrupt-controller
are "provider" properties.
And I think the comment would be more appropriate in the pmc node, for
the same reason that I think the commit description isn't entirely
accurate.
Thierry
Attachment:
pgp0A01h5gKM7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
