On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:33:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> > +static int ak5558_set_dai_mute(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int mute)
>>> > +{
>>> > + struct snd_soc_codec *codec = dai->codec;
>>> > + struct ak5558_priv *ak5558 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
>>>
>>> > + int ndt = 0;
>>>
>>> It might be even
>>>
>>> int ndt = max(ak5558->fs ? 583000 / ak5558->fs : 5, 5);
>>
>> Please don't encourage people to use the ternery operator like that, it
>> does nothing for legibility not to write out the conditionals.
>
> Noted.
>
>>> > +static const struct i2c_device_id ak5558_i2c_id[] = {
>>> > + { "ak5558", 0 },
>>> > + { }
>>> > +};
>>> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ak5558_i2c_id);
>>
>>> I dunno if it's really helpful to have. Though it's up to Mark and you.
>>
>> I don't care either way.
>
> Since Mark is okay with either, I would rather switch to ->probe_new()
> and remove above table.
Sure, will do. I forgot to put it in v1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
