Am Dienstag, 30. Januar 2018, 16:29:52 CET schrieb Jonathan Cameron:
Hi Jonathan,
> + /* Special path for single element SGLs with small packets. */
> + if (sg_is_last(sgl) && sgl->length <= SEC_SMALL_PACKET_SIZE) {
This looks strangely familiar. Is this code affected by a similar issue fixed
in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10173981?
> +static int sec_alg_skcipher_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm,
> + const u8 *key, unsigned int keylen,
> + enum sec_cipher_alg alg)
> +{
> + struct sec_alg_skcipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> + if (ctx->enc_key) {
> + /* rekeying */
> + dev = SEC_Q_DEV(ctx->queue);
> + memset(ctx->enc_key, 0, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY);
> + memset(ctx->dec_key, 0, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY);
> + memset(&ctx->enc_req, 0, sizeof(ctx->enc_req));
> + memset(&ctx->dec_req, 0, sizeof(ctx->dec_req));
> + } else {
> + /* new key */
> + dev = SEC_Q_DEV(ctx->queue);
> + ctx->enc_key = dma_zalloc_coherent(dev, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY,
> + &ctx->enc_pkey,
> GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!ctx->enc_key) {
> + spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + ctx->dec_key = dma_zalloc_coherent(dev, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY,
> + &ctx->dec_pkey,
> GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!ctx->dec_key) {
> + spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> + goto out_free_enc;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> + if (sec_alg_skcipher_init_context(tfm, key, keylen, alg))
> + goto out_free_all;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_free_all:
> + memset(ctx->dec_key, 0, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY);
> + dma_free_coherent(dev, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY,
> + ctx->dec_key, ctx->dec_pkey);
> + ctx->dec_key = NULL;
> +out_free_enc:
> + memset(ctx->enc_key, 0, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY);
> + dma_free_coherent(dev, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY,
> + ctx->enc_key, ctx->enc_pkey);
> + ctx->enc_key = NULL;
Please use memzero_explicit.
> +
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +static int sec_alg_skcipher_setkey_aes_xts(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm,
> + const u8 *key, unsigned int
> keylen) +{
> + enum sec_cipher_alg alg;
> +
> + switch (keylen) {
> + case AES_KEYSIZE_128 * 2:
> + alg = SEC_AES_XTS_128;
> + break;
> + case AES_KEYSIZE_256 * 2:
> + alg = SEC_AES_XTS_256;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Please add xts_check_key()
> +
> + return sec_alg_skcipher_setkey(tfm, key, keylen, alg);
> +static int sec_alg_skcipher_setkey_3des_ecb(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm,
> + const u8 *key, unsigned int
> keylen) +{
> + if (keylen != DES_KEY_SIZE * 3)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return sec_alg_skcipher_setkey(tfm, key, keylen,
> SEC_3DES_ECB_192_3KEY); +}
> +
> +static int sec_alg_skcipher_setkey_3des_cbc(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm,
> + const u8 *key, unsigned int
> keylen) +{
> + if (keylen != DES3_EDE_KEY_SIZE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return sec_alg_skcipher_setkey(tfm, key, keylen,
> SEC_3DES_CBC_192_3KEY); +}
Please use __des3_ede_setkey
> +static void sec_skcipher_alg_callback(struct sec_bd_info *sec_resp,
> + struct skcipher_request *skreq)
> +{
> + struct sec_crypto_request *sec_req = skcipher_request_ctx(skreq);
> + struct sec_alg_skcipher_ctx *ctx = sec_req->skcipher_ctx;
> + struct crypto_skcipher *atfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(skreq);
> + struct crypto_async_request *nextrequest;
> + struct sec_crypto_request *nextsec_req;
> + struct skcipher_request *nextskreq;
> + int icv_or_skey_en;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + icv_or_skey_en = (sec_resp->w0 & SEC_BD_W0_ICV_OR_SKEY_EN_M) >>
> + SEC_BD_W0_ICV_OR_SKEY_EN_S;
> + if (sec_resp->w1 & SEC_BD_W1_BD_INVALID || icv_or_skey_en == 3) {
> + dev_err(ctx->queue->dev_info->dev,
> + "Got an invalid answer %lu %d\n",
> + sec_resp->w1 & SEC_BD_W1_BD_INVALID,
> + icv_or_skey_en);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + /*
> + * We need to muddle on to avoid getting stuck with elements
> + * on the queue. Error will be reported so userspace should
> + * know a mess has occurred.
> + */
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock(&ctx->queue->queuelock);
> + sec_free_opdata(ctx->queue, skreq->src, skreq->dst, skreq);
> + /* Put the IV in place for chained cases */
> + switch (ctx->cipher_alg) {
> + case SEC_AES_CBC_128:
> + case SEC_AES_CBC_192:
> + case SEC_AES_CBC_256:
> + if (sec_req->req.w0 & SEC_BD_W0_DE)
> + sg_pcopy_to_buffer(skreq->dst, sec_req->len_out,
> + skreq->iv,
> + crypto_skcipher_ivsize(atfm),
> + skreq->cryptlen -
> + crypto_skcipher_ivsize(atfm));
> + else
> + sg_pcopy_to_buffer(skreq->src, sec_req->len_in,
> + skreq->iv,
> + crypto_skcipher_ivsize(atfm),
> + skreq->cryptlen - 16);
> + break;
> + case SEC_AES_CTR_128:
> + case SEC_AES_CTR_192:
> + case SEC_AES_CTR_256:
> + crypto_inc(skreq->iv, 16);
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* Do not update */
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (ctx->queue->havesoftqueue &&
> + !list_empty(&ctx->queue->softqueue.list) &&
> + sec_queue_empty(ctx->queue)) {
> + nextrequest = crypto_dequeue_request(&ctx->queue->softqueue);
> + nextskreq = container_of(nextrequest, struct skcipher_request,
> + base);
> + nextsec_req = skcipher_request_ctx(nextskreq);
> + /* We know there is space so this cannot fail */
> + sec_queue_send(ctx->queue, &nextsec_req->req, nextskreq);
Looking at that code and considering what you said that only for CTR and CBC
you need to apply proper IV dependency handling, I am wondering why XTS is not
covered (there is an IV). What about the DES/3DES ciphers?
> + /*
> + * Add to hardware queue only under following circumstances
> + * 1) Software and hardware queue empty so no chain dependencies
> + * 2) No dependencies as new IV - (check software queue empty
> + * to maintain order)
> + * 3) No dependencies because the mode does no chaining.
> + *
> + * In other cases first insert onto the software queue which is then
> + * emptied as requests complete
> + */
> + if (!ctx->queue->havesoftqueue ||
> + (list_empty(&ctx->queue->softqueue.list) &&
> + (sec_queue_empty(ctx->queue) ||
> + ctx->prev_iv_address != skreq->iv))) {
Maybe you want to rely on the flag given by the upper layer that I will
propose shortly.
> +
> +static void sec_alg_skcipher_exit(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm)
> +{
> + struct sec_alg_skcipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
> + struct device *dev = SEC_Q_DEV(ctx->queue);
> +
> + if (ctx->enc_key) {
> + memset(ctx->enc_key, 0, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY);
> + dma_free_coherent(dev, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY,
> + ctx->enc_key, ctx->enc_pkey);
> + }
> + if (ctx->dec_key) {
> + memset(ctx->dec_key, 0, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY);
> + dma_free_coherent(dev, SEC_MAX_CIPHER_KEY,
> + ctx->dec_key, ctx->dec_pkey);
Please use memzero_explicit.
> +
> + /* Get the first idle queue in SEC device */
> + for (i = 0; i < SEC_Q_NUM; i++)
I think you should use curly braces here too. Consider what checkpatch.pl
thinks.
> + if (!sec_queue_in_use_get(&info->queues[i])) {
> + sec_queue_in_use(&info->queues[i], 1);
> + spin_unlock(&info->dev_lock);
> + *q = &info->queues[i];
> + return 0;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&info->dev_lock);
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +static int sec_count_queues_in_use(struct sec_dev_info *info)
> +{
> + int i, count = 0;
> +
> + spin_lock(&info->dev_lock);
> + for (i = 0; i < SEC_Q_NUM; i++)
dto.
Ciao
Stephanÿôèº{.nÇ+?·?®??+%?Ëÿ±éݶ¥?wÿº{.nÇ+?·?zø?zÚÞ{ø§¶?¡Ü¨}©?²Æ zÚ&j:+v?¨þø ¯ù ®w¥þ?à2?Þ?¨èÚ&¢)ß¡«a¶Úÿÿûàz¿äz¹Þ?ú+?ù???Ý¢jÿ?wèþf
