On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote: > >> The only remaining question is if we should create generic DT binding > >> for fifo depth. Arnd, Rob: Any opinion about it? > >> Definitely will be worth to have one generic binding if this is generic feature. > >> But if this is just specific feature for us then current properties should > >> be fine. > >> > >> In general all these xlnx,XXX properties just reflect all configurable options > >> which you can setup in design tool which means that provide full hw description > >> with all variants and they are automatically generated from tools. > >> > >> Please let me know what you think. > > > > I like: > > > > rx-fifo-depth > > tx-fifo-depth > > No problem with that. Let Kedar to fix it according this and he will send v2 with this. > Sounds reasonable to me too. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
