Re: [PATCH v5 08/13] iommu/rockchip: Control clocks needed to access the IOMMU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Robin,

Thanks for your reply.

On 01/24/2018 09:49 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:

+Optional properties:
+- clocks : A list of master clocks requires for the IOMMU to be
accessible

s/requires/required/
ok

+           by the host CPU. The number of clocks depends on the master
+           block and might as well be zero. See [1] for generic clock

Oops, some subtleties of English here :)

To say "the number of clocks ... might as well be zero" effectively
implies "there's no point ever specifying any clocks". I guess what you
really mean here is "...might well be...", i.e. it is both valid and
reasonably likely to require zero clocks.
ok

+           bindings description.
+
+[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
  Optional properties:
  - rockchip,disable-mmu-reset : Don't use the mmu reset operation.
@@ -27,5 +34,6 @@ Example:
          reg = <0xff940300 0x100>;
          interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
          interrupt-names = "vopl_mmu";
+        clocks = <&cru ACLK_VOP1>, <&cru DCLK_VOP1>, <&cru HCLK_VOP1>;
          #iommu-cells = <0>;
      };
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
index c4131ca792e0..8a5e2a659b67 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
   * published by the Free Software Foundation.
   */
+#include <linux/clk.h>
  #include <linux/compiler.h>
  #include <linux/delay.h>
  #include <linux/device.h>
@@ -91,6 +92,8 @@ struct rk_iommu {
      struct device *dev;
      void __iomem **bases;
      int num_mmu;
+    struct clk_bulk_data *clocks;
+    int num_clocks;
      bool reset_disabled;
      struct iommu_device iommu;
      struct list_head node; /* entry in rk_iommu_domain.iommus */
@@ -450,6 +453,38 @@ static int rk_iommu_force_reset(struct rk_iommu
*iommu)
      return 0;
  }
+static int rk_iommu_of_get_clocks(struct rk_iommu *iommu)
+{
+    struct device_node *np = iommu->dev->of_node;
+    int ret;
+    int i;
+
+    ret = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "clocks", "#clock-cells");
+    if (ret == -ENOENT)
+        return 0;
+    else if (ret < 0)
+        return ret;
+
+    iommu->num_clocks = ret;
+    iommu->clocks = devm_kcalloc(iommu->dev, iommu->num_clocks,
+                     sizeof(*iommu->clocks), GFP_KERNEL);
+    if (!iommu->clocks)
+        return -ENOMEM;
+
+    for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_clocks; ++i) {
+        iommu->clocks[i].clk = of_clk_get(np, i);
+        if (IS_ERR(iommu->clocks[i].clk)) {
+            ret = PTR_ERR(iommu->clocks[i].clk);
+            goto err_clk_put;
+        }
+    }

Just to confirm my understanding from a quick scan through the code, the
reason we can't use clk_bulk_get() here is that currently, clocks[i].id
being NULL means we'd end up just getting the first clock multiple
times, right?
right, without a valid name, it would return the first clock.

    /* Walk up the tree of devices looking for a clock that matches */
    while (np) {
        int index = 0;

        /*
         * For named clocks, first look up the name in the
         * "clock-names" property.  If it cannot be found, then
         * index will be an error code, and of_clk_get() will fail.
         */
        if (name)
            index = of_property_match_string(np, "clock-names", name);
        clk = __of_clk_get(np, index, dev_id, name);



I guess there could be other users who also want "just get whatever
clocks I have" functionality, so it might be worth proposing that for
the core API as a separate/follow-up patch, but it definitely doesn't
need to be part of this series.
right, i can try to do it later :)

I really don't know enough about correct clk API usage, but modulo the
binding comments it certainly looks nice and tidy now;

Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
thanks.

Thanks,
Robin.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux