On 2018-01-25 18:27, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi Dong,
<snip>
And i see the dtsi file does not include Freescale/NXP copyright,
is there a reason?
The dtsi is quite different from the downstream version. But you are
right, I looked extensively at the downstream version, so I'll add the
NXP copyright.
Okay, i see.
BTW: Could you check internally to see if Freescale/NXP would be okay
with relicensing the DT bits I pulled from downstream as dual GPL-2.0
and MIT, to align with other DTs in the kernel?
I thought it should be okay. But i pulled Post Lauren in to give you
a confirmed answer.
Lauren,
Can you help with this question?
BTW it's quite strange that my gmail did not receive your MX8MQ patch
series except clk part.
Lucas, Could you help have me CCed next time?
I'd like to help review and test the patch series.
For this time, can you help send them all to me as attachment?
I'm about to send v2 of the series. I'll CC you on the submission.
Great.
(You can also send all IMX related patches to linux-imx@xxxxxxx
maillist
i created recently for tracking all IMX related upstream activities.
Most Freescale/NXP driver owners are in this list that could help on
the review. Shawn, do you think if i can put it in MAINTAINER file?)
That's great news that there is now a common address for this. I think
it would be a good idea to have it added to MAINTAINERS as a reviewer.
Thanks for supporting.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
Regards,
Lucas
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
