Hi Niklas, On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2018-01-05 09:47:11 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:31 PM, Niklas Söderlund >> <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > To be able to read fused calibration values from hardware the size of >> > the register resource of TSC1 needs to be incremented to cover one more >> > register which holds the information if the calibration values have been >> > fused or not. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi >> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi >> > @@ -2385,7 +2385,7 @@ >> > >> > tsc: thermal@e6198000 { >> > compatible = "renesas,r8a7795-thermal"; >> > - reg = <0 0xe6198000 0 0x68>, >> > + reg = <0 0xe6198000 0 0x6c>, >> >> Perhaps we should just make it 0x100? >> I'd be very surprised if that would be smaller than the granularity of the >> address decoder circuitry. > > I have no problem with making it 0x100, looking at r8a7795.dtsi it seems > we are mixing what we do today. For example the i2c nodes are defined > with a precise size less then 0x100 while the USB-DMAC nodes uses a size > of 0x100 while the size in the documentation is less then 0x100. Maybe > we should define how we should handle cases like this and update the > existing DT files? > > Do you think I should make all thermal registers 0x100 and not just TSC1 > and resend? I think that makes sense. Granularities below PAGE_SIZE can't be enforced well anyway (Hi, gpio5/6/7 virtualization!). Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html