On 26/12/2017 at 11:16:34 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > + Philippe
> >
> > On 22/12/2017 at 11:43:33 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> >> I'll change it for v3 of this patch however it will end up like this:
> >> >> //SPDX-License...
> >> >
> >> > That should be /* SPDX-License */, // is for c files.
> >>
> >> Got any reference for that? Since we're using the C preprocessor before
> >> feeding them to dtc, we can use the same // style for both, builds fine.
> >>
> >> Only for my private DT overlay files that I use directly with dtc I
> >> couldn't adopt that style.
>
> We are well past the point of being able to build most dts files with just dtc.
>
> > The doc states:
> >
> > If a specific tool cannot handle the standard comment style, then the
> > appropriate comment mechanism which the tool accepts shall be used. This
> > is the reason for having the "/\* \*/" style comment in C header
> > files.
> >
> > I interpreted that as dtc doesn't handle // comments, use /**/
>
> It's been so long, I'd forgotten that. Perhaps we should fix dtc to
> handle // comments.
>
The would probably be the best solution so we get a somewhat consistent
style before people start moving the existing SDPX identifiers to the
top of their dtsi/dts files.
> >
> > But I agree it also states:
> > .dts{i}: // SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
>
> Or we could still change this. The guidelines aren't merged yet.
>
> Rob
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
