On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:04:21AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Some "atmel,at25" compatible SPI EEPROMs (e.g. Microchip 25lc040) use an > >> odd number of address bits. This patch series adds support for > >> instantiating such devices from DT. > >> > >> Do EEPROMs using 17 or 25 address bits, as mentioned in > >> include/linux/spi/eeprom.h, really exist? > >> Or should we just limit it to a single odd value (9 bits)? > >> > >> This has been tested with a bunch of 25lc040 EEPROMs. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Geert Uytterhoeven (3): > >> eeprom: at25: Add DT support for EEPROMs with odd address bits > >> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Grammar s/are can/can/ > >> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Document device-specific compatible values > > > > 2 and 3 are fixes and I'll apply for 4.15 if you don't mind. > > Thanks, I don't mind. Both applied. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
