Hi Rob,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Some "atmel,at25" compatible SPI EEPROMs (e.g. Microchip 25lc040) use an
>> odd number of address bits. This patch series adds support for
>> instantiating such devices from DT.
>>
>> Do EEPROMs using 17 or 25 address bits, as mentioned in
>> include/linux/spi/eeprom.h, really exist?
>> Or should we just limit it to a single odd value (9 bits)?
>>
>> This has been tested with a bunch of 25lc040 EEPROMs.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Geert Uytterhoeven (3):
>> eeprom: at25: Add DT support for EEPROMs with odd address bits
>> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Grammar s/are can/can/
>> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Document device-specific compatible values
>
> 2 and 3 are fixes and I'll apply for 4.15 if you don't mind.
Thanks, I don't mind.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
