Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM: dts: imx6sl: remove the use of pingrp macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:17:22AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> [... and so on for the other groups ... ]
> 
> I'm confused now :-) . Current linux-next [0] shows the pin-settings as part 
> of imx6sl.dtsi - a way a lot of other architectures organize their pingroups 
> too, with the board file only referencing the relevant pingroups from the 
> predefined ones of the soc.
> 
> So I guess your move to the pingrp-header moved them out of the imx6sl.dtsi to 
> the .h and is not part of linux-next;

Yes, my for-next branch was excluded from linux-next temporarily for
some reason.  I will ask Stephen to add it back once v3.14-rc1 is out.
That said, you can see nothing we developed in this cycle on linux-next
for now.

> but this patch (and the others in this 
> series) now moves the definitions into the individual board files. Can't you 
> just move them back to the soc-dtsi files to prevent each board duplicating 
> them?

No.  That will bring back the problem we try to solve from the
beginning [1].

Shawn

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/275912/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux