On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 17:21 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
>> - uart6: serial@1e787000 {
>> - compatible = "ns16550a";
>> - reg = <0x1e787000 0x1000>;
>> + vuart: vuart@1e787000 {
>
> Bit of a nit, but arguably this should be `vuart: serial@...`?
Yep, that makes sense.
>
>> + compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-vuart";
>> + reg = <0x1e787000 0x40>;
>> reg-shift = <2>;
>> interrupts = <10>;
>> clocks = <&clk_uart>;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi
>> index 251fc9f4637e..0b793305120a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi
>> @@ -287,9 +278,19 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + uart1: serial@1e783000 {
>
> Earlier in the series you had a patch moving the ADC node to be in
> address-order with respect to the rest of the nodes but this change puts uart1
> out of address-order. As it turns out the uarts blocks are sprayed around in
> the address-space: uart1 and uart5 are together, the vuart is elsewhere, then
> uarts 2-4 are lumped together in another spot. I think it makes sense to
> consolidate them, but it is inconsistent. Thoughts?
Yeah. I'll move them to where they should be.
Cheers,
Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
