On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:50:05AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > @@ -18,6 +18,19 @@ > > memory { > > reg = <0x10000000 0x80000000>; > > }; > > + > > + regulators { > > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > > This is _not_ a simple bus. It doesn't have the required ranges > property. Maybe the real question is that if the required ranges property is missing, why kernel still accepts it as a simple bus and populate the devices under it? > > Why do these need to be in a regulators container node? We don't group > dma controllers under a dmas node, or uarts under a uarts node. Grouping fixed clocks under 'clocks' and fixed regulators under 'regulators' is a common pattern which can be found on most of the ARM dts files. Shawn > > > + > > + reg_usb_otg_vbus: usb_otg_vbus { > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + regulator-name = "usb_otg_vbus"; > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; > > + gpio = <&gpio4 15 0>; > > + enable-active-low; > > + }; > > + }; > > }; > > Thanks, > Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html