On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:52:46AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > I'm well aware that the DT branch has not been merged, and that's because > there has been no consensus from DT maintainers on the massive rework > you did as the base of the branch. I guess the 'massive rework' you're talking about is the patch series that begins with 'ARM: dts: imx6qdl: make pinctrl nodes board specific'? If so, I hope you would agree that we're trying to solve a real problem [1], even though the solution does not look like the best to you. So which specific part of the solution are you objecting to? Those MX6QDL_*_PINGRP macros defined in imx6qdl-pingrp.h? If that's the case, I can send a follow-up patch to kill the macros by filling in the pin group definitions directly. The pros is that the pin group definitions for given board will be more intuitive, and the cons is that the change set will be even more massive, because the same multi-lines pin group definitions will be duplicated in multiple board dts files, which use the same group of pins for given device. Or any other better idea? > > Given the timing, it's not looking like it will be resolved in time for > the 3.14 merge window (which might open today). That's frustrating and will be surprising a lot of people who expect to see their board support in 3.14 release. Shawn [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/275912/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
