On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 07:34:22PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > >> I'm guessing this is going to mess up Shawn's cleanup patches, but > >> time has ran out for 3.14 for those so they will need to be respun > >> anyway, most likely. > >> > >> We can apply them to arm-soc's dt branch. I think it's better if we > >> merge them since dts files tend to be one of the conflict-ridden areas > >> (even if this particular instance isn't). Send the series our way if > >> you want, or send a branch pull request, your choice. > > > > There's no conflict, and they build fine according to my autobuilder > > which includes arm-soc for-next. > > Great, I didn't see any patches sent from you though. Should I > cherry-pick them from -next instead? If there's no conflicts, and if there other imx DT changes aren't going to be submitted, then why is there any need to cherry-pick them into arm-soc? Are you suggesting that DT changes happen spontaneously all the time? If that's true, why couldn't the new board support be put in during -rc kernels? What you're saying doesn't really make _that_ much sense to me at the moment. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad. Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
