Hi Michal, On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:19:44AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Moritz > > sorry for delay. No problem. > > On 12.9.2017 01:22, Moritz Fischer wrote: > > Add support for the National Instruments Project Sulfur SDR > > motherboards Rev 2,3 and 4. > > > > Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 3 + > > arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ni-sulfur-rev2.dts | 84 +++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ni-sulfur-rev3.dts | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ni-sulfur-rev4.dts | 26 ++++++ > > arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ni-sulfur.dtsi | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 364 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ni-sulfur-rev2.dts > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ni-sulfur-rev3.dts > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ni-sulfur-rev4.dts > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ni-sulfur.dtsi > > Is this publicly available board? Will be in Q1 2018 was announced at GRCon'17 ([1]). Some of the Rev3s are currently deployed in Norway as part of a radar system. > I am not quite sure we should apply these dts files. There are a lot of > boards with zynq and there must be any strong argument for applying this > to the tree. For arm32 with even flat tree structure. What's the issue with merging them, except for having 3 more files? > Arnd: Do you have any policy about it? > > Thanks, > Michal Thanks, Moritz [1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-CV_07uSBIuODc5bmV2QXhnODA/view
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
