* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> [170829 05:28]: > > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki > > On 29/08/17 15:10, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > >> Do we even want to add SGX to the .dts? We don't have proper drivers for > >> SGX. If we ever do, who knows what kind of DT data they need. I know the > >> DT data for SGX in TI's kernel tree has changed at least once. > > > > I don't think reg or interrupts will be removed, so the properties > > added by Tony look pretty safe?. I guess if we ever have a driver > > Oh, and one more thing about the regs. I believe SGX consists of > multiple register blocks. But as it's not documented in any public docs, > there's just that single block in the DT data. I'm not sure if single > block or multiple blocks would be the right approach, but then, I guess > we can always live with just a single block and if needed split the > blocks inside the driver. OK, those register blocks can easily be child nodes of the module if needed. This is for the parent interconnect target module revc/sysc/syss registers that we already have mapped in legacy platform data for the interconnect code. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
