Vivek, On Tuesday 08 August 2017 09:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Koshon, > > On 2017-08-08 17:39, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move >>> further towards the generic phy usage. Right now the qcom-ufs exports >>> a bunch of APIs that are used by the host controller to initialize >>> the phy. >>> With this patch series, we populate the phy_init() which was a no-op >>> earlier. The host controller then calls the phy_init() at the designated >>> place rather than doing it invariably in ufs_hcd_init(). >>> >>> As part of this series, we introduce phy modes for ufs phy. >>> The M-PHY has two data rates defined for each generations (Gears) - >>> Rate A and Rate B. These can serve as the two modes of ufs HS phy. >>> Host controller can direct the phy to set the respective configurations >>> based on the phy modes. >>> >>> The patch-series has been tested with necessary dt patches on db820c. >> >> Can the first 3 patches go independently of the other 2 or should all this be >> merged together? > > The first 3 patches are independent, but the next 2 patches depend on those 3 > for functionality. > I would prefer all to go in one tree. If you want to pull these in the phy tree, > I will request Subhash/Martin to ack the patches. sure, that should be fine! Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
