On 24/07/17 17:32, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 24/07/17 17:00, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Instead of the callsites choosing between of_cpu_device_node_get if the >>> CPUs are registered as of_node is populated by then and of_get_cpu_node >>> when the CPUs are not yet registered as CPU of_nodes are not yet stashed >>> thereby needing to parse the device tree, we can call of_get_cpu_node >>> in case the CPUs are not yet registered. >>> >>> This will allow to use of_cpu_device_node_get anywhere hiding the >>> details from the caller. >>> >>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> include/linux/of_device.h | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> Let me know if you are OK with this change. I keep seeing different >>> drivers calling of_get_cpu_node or of_cpu_device_node_get based on what >>> they are aware of or copying from other place without knowing the >>> details. I am trying to avoid that and ask to use of_cpu_device_node_get >>> at all places instead. >> >> Seems fine to me. >> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Thanks. Can you take it through your tree itself ? I can make any follow > patches(if any) once this lands in the tree. I don't have any for now > just to avoid all cross dependencies. > Sorry for the nag. Please queue this for v4.14 via your DT tree itself. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
