On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Instead of the callsites choosing between of_cpu_device_node_get if the > CPUs are registered as of_node is populated by then and of_get_cpu_node > when the CPUs are not yet registered as CPU of_nodes are not yet stashed > thereby needing to parse the device tree, we can call of_get_cpu_node > in case the CPUs are not yet registered. > > This will allow to use of_cpu_device_node_get anywhere hiding the > details from the caller. > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/of_device.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Hi Rob, > > Let me know if you are OK with this change. I keep seeing different > drivers calling of_get_cpu_node or of_cpu_device_node_get based on what > they are aware of or copying from other place without knowing the > details. I am trying to avoid that and ask to use of_cpu_device_node_get > at all places instead. Seems fine to me. Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
