On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 10:59 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 28/07/17 02:15, Honghui Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 17:42 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07/27/2017 04:01 AM, honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> In the commit 3c8f4ad85c4b ("memory/mediatek: add support for mt2701"),
> >>> the larb->larbid was added but not initialized.
> >>> Mediatek's gen1 smi need this hardware larbid information to get the
> >>> register offset which controls whether enable iommu for this larb.
> >>> This patch add the initialize routine for larbid.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 9 +++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> >>> index 2b798bb4..fe36b3e 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> >>> @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >>> struct device_node *smi_node;
> >>> struct platform_device *smi_pdev;
> >>> + int err;
> >>>
> >>> if (!dev->pm_domain)
> >>> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >>> @@ -263,6 +264,14 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> return PTR_ERR(larb->smi.clk_smi);
> >>> larb->smi.dev = dev;
> >>>
> >>> + err = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "mediatek,larbid",
> >>> + &larb->larbid);
> >>> + if (err && of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node,
> >>> + "mediatek,mt2701-smi-larb")) {
> >>
> >> Instead of checking hard-coded bindings you should be able to determine the
> >> generation using the smi_pdev.
> >> Apart I think it would be better to check for mediatek,larbid only on
> >> MTK_SIM_GEN1, or do I miss something?
> >>
> >
> > Hi, Matthias,
> > There's a new SoC of mediatek which use MTK_SMI_GEN2 hardware, but it
> > has 2 iommus and 2 smi_common, and we are intend to send it's driver
> > soon. It need the mediatek,larbid to identify which iommu should be
> > binding to.
> >
> > This patch use the hard-code bindings will make the future work easier.
>
> In that case, might it make sense to add some indicator like "bool
> need_larb_id" to struct mtk_smi_larb_gen?
>
> Robin.
>
Hi, Robin, thanks for your advise, I will send another version later.
Thanks.
> >
> > thanks.
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >>> + dev_err(dev, "missing larbid property\n");
> >>> + return err;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> smi_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,smi", 0);
> >>> if (!smi_node)
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> >> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
> >
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
