On 07/27/2017 04:01 AM, honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In the commit 3c8f4ad85c4b ("memory/mediatek: add support for mt2701"),
the larb->larbid was added but not initialized.
Mediatek's gen1 smi need this hardware larbid information to get the
register offset which controls whether enable iommu for this larb.
This patch add the initialize routine for larbid.
Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
index 2b798bb4..fe36b3e 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct device_node *smi_node;
struct platform_device *smi_pdev;
+ int err;
if (!dev->pm_domain)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
@@ -263,6 +264,14 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(larb->smi.clk_smi);
larb->smi.dev = dev;
+ err = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "mediatek,larbid",
+ &larb->larbid);
+ if (err && of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node,
+ "mediatek,mt2701-smi-larb")) {
Instead of checking hard-coded bindings you should be able to determine the
generation using the smi_pdev.
Apart I think it would be better to check for mediatek,larbid only on
MTK_SIM_GEN1, or do I miss something?
Regards,
Matthias
+ dev_err(dev, "missing larbid property\n");
+ return err;
+ }
+
smi_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,smi", 0);
if (!smi_node)
return -EINVAL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
